OPEN Courseware (OCW)

What is Open Courseware?

Open courseware (OCW) programs are developed by universities. These universities have a department especially for develop OCW content. The content is just recordings, assignments, and readings from professors teaching a class on campus. In essence, Open Courseware (OCW) is repurposed content from traditional course.

How Does It Work?

These resources are collected and uploaded to a website accessible to everyone from around the world. OCW courses don’t involve real time professor to student communication, any deadlines or required assignments, and there’s no credit granted at the end of the course (or degree for that matter) but the classes also don’t cost anything and people can start and stop them whenever they wish. The bottom line is: OCW is all about self-learners, people who just have the thirst for knowledge. And the best part is – the top colleges in the country and world are getting on board with this, which means OCW offers fairly expensive content completely for free.

How Is It Useful?

While it might seem like kicking off an OCW site would be cheap for universities – the content is already in existence, after all – but Yale predicts it costs them about $30,000-$40,000/ year to keep their OCW running. These costs include the video equipment, the employees managing the site, and more. This isn’t a particularly huge dent at a college like Yale, but it is a completely free service and therefore Yale has no way of recouping its costs. The mission of OCWs, however, is to distribute free content. Fortunately there are many non-profits who see the value in this kind of accessible education and are donating grants and funds to the cause.

Open Courseware Organizations

The following Infographic from presents the important points around open courseware:



How Online Course Will Change the World is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at w‎.

I Love Cloud Based Apps!

It was an easy for me to move to cloud-based software services (apps) and put an end to mailing myself documents or carrying disks (I’m old! LOL) or thumb drives of large presentations. To have the convenience of having EVERYthing accessible from any Internet connected device was a dream come true!

The free services continue to grow in Higher Education and where colleges previously spent millions, Google and Microsoft are fulfilling the need. The two also have versions they promote as safer alternatives for younger students in K-12.

EdTechMagazine  wrote about this growth recently  on college campuses and shared a wonderful infographic:

Available at no cost to students and faculty, Google Apps includes cloud email, storage, hosting, word processing and collaboration tools. Previously, colleges were forced to invest millions in these services and struggled to modernize outdated technology, not to mention maintain email servers and data centers. Microsoft has followed suit with their Office 365 solution, and the cloud revolution is in full swing on campuses.


minerva-logo-from-kevin-corbettI remember many years ago, the Arizona State University complained about students enrolling in their college but never going to class because they’d stay in their dorm rooms and take online courses.

At the time, ASU had to reflect on whether this was something that was good or not. Fast forward several years later and it’s a issue more colleges are wrestling with, given the explosion in online learning.

Well, it looks like there might be some genius in a new project then, in getting students together for an online college education, living in dorms together EXCEPT….it’s MINUS the college buildings and campus!

This resonates with me personally for reasons I’ll explain below, but first let me explain a bit more about the new  Minerva Project

QUICK NOTES on Minerva

  • Name: Minerva, after the Roman Goddess of Wisdom
  • Opens: Fall 2015
  • Funding: $25 Million (so far)
  • On Board:
    • Ben Nelson (founder) [article]
      Former CEO of Snapfish
    • Stephen Kosslyn  (founder) [article]
      Director of the Center for Advanced Study in Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University and a former dean and chair of the psychology department at Harvard, recently joined as the founding dean.
    • Larry Summers
      Former US Treasury Secretary
      Former Harvard University President
    • Bob Kerry
      Former Senator from Nebraska
      Former President of New School in New York
    • Annual Half Million Dollar Award for Teaching
    • Lure Scientists with a “smaller bite” out of their research grants for overhead and allow professors to retain full ownership of all their intellectual property and discoveries.
    • Attract New Phd’s with short term contracts, autonomy over course content, and flexibility in their teaching location (since there’s no physical campus).
    • A new online learning model
    • Students socialize and learn together in college classes without a geographically fixed campus.
    • SMALL seminars (25 students per class) . VERY DIFFERENT versus the now popular MOOC
    • College Travel (6 countries in four years)
    • College Dorms (in foreign countries)
    • Language immersion
    • Cheaper

Why I Think This Will Take Off

I’m going to provide four reasons why I think Minerva could be successful.

First, my youngest daughter went to college five years ago and she selected her college based on the opportunities the college offered to travel abroad. She spent a semester at the Beijing Foreign Studies University and it was a life-changing experience for her. She graduated with a degree in International Business and another in Chinese and is currently living in China. When I visited with her in Beijing last month, half of the students from her program had returned to China.  Schools now spend a lot of time teaching about a global communities, it only makes sense that there is a now a generation of students wanting to explore the opportunities and experiences to be had in other countries, like Minerva is promoting.

Second, during any visits to her University in the United States, the administration continually boasted about their oversees efforts to recruit foreign students to their University for an “American college education experience”. This is something I hear from every college and university administrator now.

Last month, while presenting at a Superintendents’ Regional conference, one of the senior faculty expressed concerns about all the new construction in light of a historical first dip in four-year college enrollment.

And only recently, when talking to a student resident contractor in Oregon, they told me 25% of all their housing is for foreign students.

Locally, at the University of Washington, they’ve welcomed more oversees students and embraced the higher out-of-state tuition they pay (allegedly in deference to local students).

If Minerva can attract the foreign students they’re looking to capture, and provide for greater experiences at a reduced cost, it seems only natural to me that the program would be popular with a foreign audience as well.

Third, there are still students who want  (and parents willing to go in debt for…choke) the “college experience” and Minerva may provide the best college experience for its students: living and learning together in metropolitan cities around the world without being tied to a singular geographical location and its associated high tuition. I’m sure there are those who would argue about the tradition and identity to be shared with a city or campus but, I’d suggest that the “anywhere, anytime, anyplace, any pace” that online learning pundits promote, makes this next step a natural extension where buildings are no longer the thing to be identified with when trumped by greater relationships, experiences, and learning.  Frankly, I’m amazed at the amount of construction on college campuses whose administrators pound their chests extolling the value of new facilities, when tuition rates are blasting through the stratosphere.
[Note: Kaplan’s Andrew Rosen writes about this in his book: Change.EDU:Rebooting for the New Talent Economy]

Lastly and simply: Cost.  Minerva is going to challenge the strength of the traditional institutions’ “branding” –a group who only recently jumped on-board in acceptance of online learning with MOOCS (but don’t yet have a business model) AND are still beyond the financial reach for a good majority of Americans.

I’ve written about this in recent posts (College Grads: The New Debt Slaves  and  Colleges Suing Their Own Students For Repayment, and Department of Education SWAT Team) as the amount of college debt skyrockets over a TRILLION dollars. Compound the debt with record levels of both unemployment and under-employment for college grads and one might wonder if pushing a 4-year college on a high school graduate is the right thing to do.

Economically, if Minerva doesn’t have the overhead associated with buildings and campus maintenance, and is able to provide the high-level instruction they’re working to attract, all while providing a world class learning experience, I believe they could be a fantastic option for students wanting a different kind of college experience.

An option I think will only become more of the norm.


As always, I’d love to hear your thoughts/comments– thank you!


A great article by Todd Tauber The dirty little secret of online learning: Students are bored and dropping out discusses the recent over-hyped and under-completed massive online courses.

He offers a couple reasons for their failure and concludes that future IS bright with increased funding and development!



So why are all these students falling asleep, virtually, in their digital classes? Mainly because the people putting education online are still thinking in terms of classrooms. And despite incorporating “decades of research on how students learn best”, the world has changed a lot in just the last few years.


 learning has to fit in between life and work. In a recent Duke University survey of MOOC students, for example, the most commonly cited barrier to completion was “lack of time/amount of time required.” Yet most of today’s online courses basically consist of reading assignments, lecture videos, homework problems and quizzes.


 The National Science Foundation, for example, is funding a study by MIT researchers to understand exactly why the vast majority of MOOC students don’t make it to the finish line. Carnegie Mellon University, meanwhile, is spending $500,000 to $1 million to create each of 15 new courses based on up-to-date research into how adults learn online. And investments in next generation adaptive learning technologies are surging.

Also mentioned is the important need to think about MOBILE LEARNING (#mLearning) and how to properly engage students.

The rush to create online courses has, in many cases simply meant “classroom online” and, it doesn’t work. New pedagogies have to be utilized to interface with the technologies in ways that engage today’s busy and active learner. The   promise of the future is there…just not yet.

A great article read the original at:

Distance education used to be about the distance, and now it’s really about the education.” Jean Runyon, dean of learning advancement and the Virtual Campus at Anne Arundel Community College in Maryland

Why Higher Education is Looking for E-Learning Leaders

By Tanya Roscorla (Twitter: reportertanya)

Universities and community colleges are looking to hire staff who can help institutions adapt successfully to the ever-changing technology landscape.

But because online learning is a fast-moving field, the leaders that institutions hire will need to envision which technology and economic models will work.